HP Successfully Challenges SF Court's Asbestos Consolidation Program

Posted on Wednesday, 14 May 2008

Since Summer 2007, the San Francisco Superior Court had been consolidating hundreds of asbestos personal injury and wrongful death cases, without notice and without formal hearing. In December 2007, HP challenged the court's attempt to consolidate 120 cases on due process grounds. The trial court overruled the objections and HP filed a petition for a writ. The First District Court of Appeal accepted the petition and ordered briefing by the parties.

In a highly unusual move, the trial court retained its own counsel to advise the Court of Appeal to explain that it would vacate the challenged consolidation orders.

On May 14, 2008, the trial court did just that, dissolving the consolidations of not only the cases that had been challenged by HP in December, but of all of the sua sponte consolidations orders it had issued going back to August 2007.

 

Daily Journal Top Stories May 13 2008

 

Click here to read the entire article.

 

Harris Martin Publishing logo

 

Date: 22 May 2008

San Francisco Trial Judge Vacates His Own Consolidation Order

SAN FRANCISCO - A California Superior Court for San Francisco County trial court judge has entered an order vacating a previous sua sponte order in which the judge had consolidated a number of asbestos cases for trial. In re: Brayton Group 436 v. Asbestos Defendants, No. 424859 (Calif. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty.).

In a May 14 order, Judge James Robertson II said that "no case within any such [Brayton Purcell] group shall be considered part of a Code of Civil Procedure section 1048(a) consolidation, unless a noticed motion is filed, a hearing conducted, and an order issued."

According to Edward Hugo and James Parker of HUGO PARKER, LLP, counsel for asbestos Foster Wheeler, Judge Robertson issued the original sua sponte order in August 2007, consolidating asbestos cases filed by the Brayton Purcell law firm.

However, the defense counsel challenged the sua sponte order, contending that if the consolidation was allowed to stand, the cases would be tried without commonality, which the counsel argued was prejudicial to all defendants.

As such, the defense counsel filed a writ, asking the California First District Court of Appeal to reverse Judge Robertson’s consolidation order.

Before the First District Court of Appeal ruled on the matter, however, Judge Robertson filed the instant motion to vacate its sua sponte order consolidating the cases.

HUGO PARKER, LLP is located in San Francisco.

Brayton Purcell is located in Novato, Calif.

Document is Available
Call (800) 496-4319 or
Search www.harrismartin.com
Order Ref# ASB-0806-02



Copyright Note: This article was reproduced from the HarrisMartin Publishing Web site at www.harrismartin.com. While dissemination of this article via e-mail, fax or regular mail -- provided it has not been altered in any fashion -- is permitted, dissemination of multiple articles through any medium is prohibited without express consent from HarrisMartin. HarrisMartin Publishing · 920 Cassatt Rd., Ste. 210 · Berwyn, PA 19312

Tags: Untagged

Internal Banner

A Winning Record
MAIN PHONE 415-808-0300 MAIN FAX 415-808-0333